Direct Answer
Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 expired on July 24, 2026 at 12:01 AM EDT — its hard 150-day statutory limit. There was no gap: President Trump signed a memorandum on July 23 directing USTR to impose new Section 301 tariffs of 10% or 12.5% on 60 countries, effective the same instant Section 122 lapsed. USMCA-qualifying goods and CAFTA-DR textile/apparel goods are exempt. The new Section 301 duties do not stack with Section 232 tariffs (steel, aluminum, copper, autos).
The Supreme Court’s February 20, 2026 ruling in Learning Resources v. Trump opened $166 billion in IEEPA refunds for 330,000 importers of record (the IOR named on CBP Form 7501) across 53 million entry summaries. As of July 10, 2026, $86.3 billion has been repaid to importers and $121.75 billion accepted for processing through CBP’s CAPE system in the ACE Secure Data Portal, with statutory interest accruing at approximately $650 million per month under 19 U.S.C. § 1505. Section 122 and the new Section 301 tariffs are entirely separate from this IEEPA refund process.
Section 122 Expiration — July 24, 2026
When did Section 122 expire?
Step 1
What Section 122 Was
Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 gives the President authority to impose a temporary import surcharge of up to 15% for up to 150 days to address a fundamental international payments problem. It had rarely been used — the last invocation before 2026 was by President Nixon in 1971. After the Supreme Court struck down IEEPA tariffs on February 20, 2026, President Trump invoked Section 122 to impose a 10% global import surcharge effective February 24, 2026.
Step 2
Why July 24 Was a Hard Deadline
The 150-day maximum was a hard statutory cap — it could not be extended by presidential proclamation or executive order, and only Congress could have extended it. No extension bill was introduced. Section 122 expired automatically and on schedule at 12:01 AM EDT on July 24, 2026.
Step 3
What Replaced Section 122
On July 23, 2026, President Trump signed a memorandum directing USTR to impose new Section 301 tariffs of 10% or 12.5% on imports from 60 countries — covering roughly 99.4% of all U.S. imports — based on a forced-labor enforcement investigation USTR concluded in June. The new duties took effect at 12:01 AM EDT on July 24, the same instant Section 122 lapsed, closing what could otherwise have been a duty-free gap. USMCA-qualifying goods (Canada, Mexico) and CAFTA-DR textile/apparel goods are exempt, along with additional HTS subheadings added after public comment. A patented pharmaceutical article exemption took effect July 31, 2026. Five economies (EU, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland) receive combined net-of-MFN rates capped at 10% or 12.5%. The in-transit grace period covering goods loaded before the cutoff and entered by July 28, 2026 has now closed. The new Section 301 duties do not stack with Section 232 tariffs (steel, aluminum, copper, autos), which continue separately. Brazil separately received its own distinct 25% Section 301 tariff effective July 22, 2026 — not part of the 60-country action. Unlike Section 122, Section 301 has no statutory rate cap and no fixed expiration.
Step 4
How Section 122 and the New Section 301 Tariffs Differ From IEEPA
Section 122, Section 301, and IEEPA are entirely separate statutes, with separate duty streams, separate refund processes, and separate court proceedings. IEEPA duties are refundable through CBP's CAPE system — the Supreme Court ruling made them unlawful. Section 122 and Section 301 duties are NOT refundable through CAPE. A separate legal challenge to Section 122's use remains open; if it is ultimately resolved in importers' favor, Section 122 duties paid between February 24 and July 24, 2026 could become separately refundable — but that process would be independent of IEEPA CAPE filings.
Step 5
What Importers Should Do Now
Confirm whether your HTS codes and origin countries fall under the new Section 301 action, and at which rate (10% or 12.5%) — the exemption structure (USMCA, CAFTA-DR, the additional excluded HTS subheadings, and the new pharmaceutical exemption effective July 31) differs from Section 122's. The in-transit grace period for goods loaded before July 24 and entered by July 28 has now closed. Keep separate records of Section 122 duties paid between February 24 and July 24, 2026 in case the pending legal challenge to Section 122 opens a distinct refund path. Do not confuse Section 122 or Section 301 duty payments with IEEPA duty refunds — they are separate tracks.
Common Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
What replaced Section 122?
New Section 301 tariffs of 10% or 12.5%, covering imports from 60 countries (roughly 99.4% of U.S. imports), took effect at 12:01 AM EDT on July 24, 2026 — the same instant Section 122 lapsed. President Trump signed the memorandum directing USTR to impose these duties on July 23, 2026. USMCA-qualifying goods from Canada and Mexico, and CAFTA-DR textile and apparel goods, are exempt. The new Section 301 duties do not stack with Section 232 tariffs (steel, aluminum, copper, autos). Brazil separately received its own 25% Section 301 tariff effective July 22, 2026.
Does Section 122's expiration affect my IEEPA refund?
No. IEEPA tariff refunds and Section 122/Section 301 duties are entirely separate. The CAPE system processes IEEPA refunds only. Section 122's expiration and the new Section 301 tariffs have no effect on your IEEPA CAPE filing or refund timeline.
Are the new Section 301 tariffs the same rate for every country?
No. The new Section 301 tariffs are set at 10% or 12.5% depending on the country, applied across 60 countries. Five economies (EU, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland) receive combined net-of-MFN rates capped at 10% or 12.5%. USMCA-qualifying Canadian and Mexican goods and CAFTA-DR textile and apparel goods are exempt, along with additional HTS subheadings added after public comment. A patented pharmaceutical article exemption took effect July 31, 2026. The in-transit grace period covering goods loaded before the cutoff and entered by July 28, 2026 has now closed.
Do the new Section 301 tariffs stack with Section 232?
No. The new forced-labor Section 301 tariffs do not stack with Section 232 tariffs (steel, aluminum, copper, autos). However, they do stack with existing Section 301 tariffs on China and with antidumping/countervailing duties (AD/CVD). Section 232 tariffs continue to apply separately and are unaffected by the new Section 301 action.
Could Section 122 duties already paid become refundable?
This remains an open legal question tied to a separate court challenge to Section 122's use, distinct from the IEEPA case. Section 122 duties are not processed through CAPE regardless of that litigation's outcome. Importers who paid Section 122 duties between February 24 and July 24, 2026 should keep separate records in case a distinct refund process opens for that period.
⚠️
Note: Section 122 and Section 301 duties are not IEEPA duties and are not refundable through CAPE. Do not include Section 122 or Section 301 entries in your CAPE Declaration. Maintain separate records of these duty payments in case a future refund process opens for either.
Free • No Obligation • 3 Minutes
Find Out Where Your Entries Stand
TariffIQ™ identifies your CAPE phase, refund estimate, and next step. Free. No obligation. No recovery, no fee.
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm ET • [email protected]
Informational only. Not legal, tax, or financial advice. The Tariff Bureau LLC is not a law firm, is not a licensed customs broker, and is not affiliated with CBP or any U.S. government agency. The IEEPA statute of limitations accrual date remains legally unsettled. Consult qualified trade counsel for your specific situation.