IEEPA Intelligence • The Tariff Bureau

The Weekly Brief for
U.S. Importers

CAPE updates, Federal Circuit docket tracking, and actionable IEEPA refund intelligence — delivered every week. Free. No obligation.

Published on Substack • Also at tariffbureau.com/updates • Informational only • Not legal advice

$86.3BRepaid to Importers
$121.75BAccepted for Processing
$104.29BRefunds Authorized
~$79.7BStill Owed of $166B Pool
$49.1BPaid Out in June Alone
6Days to Sec. 122 Expiry
Edition 2 July 18, 2026 • Week of July 14–20
Six Days Left on Section 122. Brazil Just Got Its Answer.
This week: the global 10% surcharge under Section 122 expires in six days, and USTR has already moved on one country — a 25% Section 301 tariff on Brazil takes effect July 22, ahead of the broader 60-country action still pending finalization. Meanwhile CBP's repayment total has crossed $86 billion, Phase 3 is still tracking for late July for the ~4,000 importers with active CIT cases, and the Federal Circuit appeal remains without a briefing schedule.
Section 301 • Brazil Sources: USTR Notice of Action, July 15, 2026 • KPMG • Thompson Hine SmarTrade
USTR Imposes 25% Section 301 Tariff on Brazil, Effective July 22 — the First Country-Specific Rate to Land Ahead of Section 122's Expiration
On July 15, 2026, USTR issued a Notice of Action imposing a 25% Section 301 tariff on imports from Brazil, effective 12:01 AM EDT on July 22, 2026, subject to certain product exemptions. The action follows a Section 301 investigation into Brazilian trade, IP, and other policy practices, and lands two days before Section 122's global 10% surcharge hard-expires on July 24.

This is separate from — and may stack on top of — the broader 60-country forced-labor Section 301 action (proposed at 10% for 15 trading partners and 12.5% for 45 others) that USTR has not yet finalized. That broader rule is still expected to land within days of the Section 122 expiration, but Brazil is the first country to get a confirmed, dated rate.

If you import from Brazil, your effective duty stack changes in six days regardless of what happens with the broader Section 301 package. Model this now rather than waiting for the general rule.
CAPE Progress Sources: CBP CIT Court Declaration, July 10, 2026
$86.3 Billion Repaid, $49.1 Billion of It in June Alone — the Pace Is Accelerating, Not Slowing
CBP's latest court declaration confirms $86.3 billion repaid to importers as of July 10, 2026, including statutory interest, with $121.75 billion now accepted for processing — up from roughly $90 billion in mid-June. June alone accounted for $49.1 billion in payouts, more than double the $23.6 billion the government collected in new tariff revenue over the same period.

Of the full $166 billion IEEPA pool, roughly $79.7 billion remains outstanding. At June's pace, most of the currently-accepted claims should clear within the next couple of months — though thousands of approved refunds remain stuck at Treasury on nothing more than missing ACH banking information, and a separate pool of entries failed validation checks that are correctable with a resubmitted CAPE Declaration.
CAPE Phase 3 Sources: CBP / CIT June 9 Hearing • Holland & Knight • Foley & Lardner • Cato Institute
Phase 3 Still on Track for Late July — Still Only ~4,000 Importers Positioned to Collect
CBP Executive Assistant Commissioner Susan Thomas confirmed at the June 9 CIT hearing that CAPE Phase 3 programming will be ready by the end of July 2026, covering finally liquidated entries — the category Phases 1 and 2 cannot touch. As of this edition, that timeline has not slipped.

DOJ's position, reiterated at the June 9 hearing and in its Federal Circuit appeal, remains that Phase 3 refunds will be processed only for importers who filed individual Section 1581(i) lawsuits at the CIT — roughly 4,000 of 330,000 total importers. The finally liquidated entry category covers an estimated $11.4–$30 billion depending on whose analysis you use (Cato Institute vs. Foley & Lardner / Holland & Knight). If you haven't filed at the CIT and are considering it, the window to act is now — the two-year statute of limitations clock began ticking in early 2025.
United States v. Euro-Notions Florida — Federal Circuit Appeal Tracker
June 2–3
2026
DOJ files notices of appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, challenging the CIT’s universal refund orders in Euro-Notions Florida v. United States (CIT No. 25-595) and related cases. Argument: CIT orders constitute impermissible universal injunctions under Trump v. CASA, 606 U.S. 831 (2025). Filed
June 4
2026
Terry Precision Cycling's class certification motion in V.O.S. Selections (CIT No. 25-00066), seeking to certify a class of importers with IEEPA refund claims not currently eligible for CAPE processing. Government response was due June 25, 2026. No ruling confirmed as of this edition — we're continuing to watch the docket directly rather than rely on secondary reporting alone. Pending ruling
July 15
2026
USTR issues Notice of Action imposing a 25% Section 301 tariff on Brazil, effective July 22, 2026 — the first confirmed country-specific rate ahead of Section 122's expiration. Separate legal track from the IEEPA refund litigation, but directly affects the duty stack for Brazil-sourced importers. Effective July 22
As of
July 18
No briefing schedule set at the Federal Circuit. The notice of appeal remains on file; the government is expected to seek a stay of the universal injunction pending appeal. No stay has been confirmed granted as of this edition. CAPE Phases 1 and 2 continue unaffected. Phase 3 remains conditioned on individual CIT plaintiff status. Active — Watch
Watch for
Section 122 expiration on July 24; finalization of the broader 60-country Section 301 forced-labor rates (expected within days of July 24); briefing schedule order from the Federal Circuit; government stay motion ruling; Phase 3 CAPE deployment announcement; class certification ruling in V.O.S. Selections. Upcoming
Section 122 Sources: FreightFigures • Nakachi Eckhardt & Jacobson • tariffstool.com • Brownstein • USTR
The 10% Global Surcharge Expires July 24. Brazil Already Has Its Replacement Rate — the Rest of the World Is Still Waiting.
Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 hard-expires at 12:01 AM EDT on July 24, 2026 — six days from today. The statute caps the emergency surcharge at 150 days and 15% maximum; Congress cannot extend it without a new vote, and the President cannot extend it by executive action alone. No Congressional extension bill has advanced.

The broader replacement — USTR's proposed Section 301 duties of 10–12.5% on 60 countries from the forced-labor investigation — is still not finalized as of this edition, though finalization is expected within days of the July 24 deadline. Brazil is the exception: its 25% Section 301 rate is already confirmed, effective July 22, ahead of the general rule.

Separately: Pharma Section 232 takes effect July 31, 2026. Section 122 duties remain entirely separate from IEEPA duties and are not part of the CAPE refund process; keep Section 122 payment records as a distinct line item.
Cato Institute Analysis Source: Cato at Liberty, June 29, 2026
60% of Refund Value Has Gone to 30% of Entries — Small Importers Are Still Being Left Behind
The Cato Institute’s June 29 analysis of CBP’s CIT filing found that CBP had approved refunds covering approximately 60% of its total refund obligation — representing only 30% of all import entries on which IEEPA tariffs were paid. Translation: approved refunds are concentrated in high-value entries from large importers, a pattern CIT Judge Eaton himself noted at the June 9 hearing.

Small and mid-size importers — with lower per-entry values but often steeper proportional duty exposure — remain disproportionately in the queue. With overall repayment now past $86 billion, the gap has narrowed in dollar terms, but nothing in CBP's process changes who gets processed first: filer volume and validation speed, not entry size or urgency of need.
Informational only. Not legal, tax, or financial advice. The Tariff Bureau LLC is not a law firm, is not a licensed customs broker, and is not affiliated with CBP or any U.S. government agency. The IEEPA statute of limitations accrual date remains legally unsettled. All facts triple-checked against primary sources: CBP.gov, USTR.gov, CSMS notices, CIT court filings, Holland & Knight, Foley & Lardner, Cato Institute, and cited trade publications. Consult qualified trade counsel for your specific situation.
Alex Monroe AI Trade Analyst
Alex Monroe
AI Trade Analyst • TariffIQ™
Online 24/7

Find Out Where You Stand

TariffIQ™ identifies your Phase 1, Phase 2, or CIT-track position in minutes. Free. No obligation.

Free Assessment → Start Engagement

(404) 882-5839 • Mon–Fri 9am–6pm ET

🇹🇼 繁體中文 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇫🇷 Français 🇪🇸 Español 🇩🇪 Deutsch